Showing posts with label Healthcare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Healthcare. Show all posts

Friday, October 15, 2010

Medicare actuary: Reform will cost some seniors

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/43529.html

A Medicare official concedes that seniors may have to dig deeper into their wallets next year thanks to the health care law.

The new analysis obtained by POLITICO finds the health care overhaul will result in increased out-of-pocket costs for seniors on Medicare Advantage plans.

Richard Foster, the actuary for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, also tells Senate Republicans that the overhaul will result in “less generous benefit packages” for Medicare Advantage plans next year. Foster is independent from the administration and non-partisan. 

Democrats have long contended that Medicare Advantage plans – private insurance alternatives to Medicare – overpay private insurers, increasing premiums for everyone, and needs to be reformulated.
But Republicans say dramatic changes to the program mean some seniors won’t be able to keep their plans – a promise President Barack Obama made during the reform debate – and the GOP has made the issue part of its attempt to roll back the health law.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, says the administration is trying to downplay the effects of the overhaul on the Medicare Advantage plans.
“Painting a rosy picture of Medicare Advantage options denies the facts from the government’s own chief actuary,” he said in a statement to POLITICO. “And it’s a disservice to the 11 million current beneficiaries who count on this popular program.”

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius says, in a separate letter sent recently to Grassley, the changes in the health care overhaul will end up strengthening the program.
“Next year, seniors will have new benefits, new protections against fraud, and better Medicare Advantage choices with meaningful differences at affordable premiums, and more beneficiaries will participate in the program,” she wrote.

Sebelius says that the remaining Medicare Advantage plans have higher standards to meet, stemming from a 2008 Medicare law. In addition, 99.7 percent of Medicare beneficiaries who have access to an Advantage plan this year will have it next year and that premiums are expected to decline by 1 percent next year.
Foster says the additional costs seniors face will be partially offset by other pieces of the law, including reduced cost sharing for Medicare Parts A and B, lower Part B premiums and the filling of the prescription drug donut hole.

Last week, Grassley’s office highlighted an error Sebelius made in a speech to a gathering of AARP members. She incorrectly said the number of Medicare Advantage plans would increase next year. HHS later changed the written copy of the speech online without highlighting the change, which angered Grassley.
“Despite making a limited correction last week to an earlier speech delivered in Florida, the administration refuses to set the record straight appropriately,” Grassley said.

“But a new letter from Medicare’s chief actuary is nonpartisan and indisputable. Seniors enrolled in Medicare Advantage will pay more out of their own pockets as a result of the new health care law. Their costs will go up by hundreds of dollars on average in the coming years, by $346 in 2011 to a high of $923 in 2017.”

CLARIFICATION: The cost estimate came from the office of the actuary for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, an independent, non-partisan office.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/43529.html#ixzz12QWJXPbo


Friday, April 9, 2010

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Dingell slip: "...to control the people."

The truth comes out, what Health Care Reform is really all about:  CONTROL

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Does this look fishy to you?

 Maybe I'm a cynic, maybe I'm paranoid, but what the hell is this garbage?  I've never seen an EO with a blank date.  Has this guy already signed it?  How much weight does an EO carry over Congress?  Is this an enforceable law, or some bull$#!+ to get pro-life Democrats to commit political suicide and vote to fund federally subsidized abortions?

Executive Order

- - - - - - -

ensuring enforcement and implementation of abortion restrictions in the patient protection and affordable care act
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" (approved March ­­__, 2010), I hereby order as follows:
Section 1.  Policy.
Following the recent passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("the Act"), it is necessary to establish an adequate enforcement mechanism to ensure that Federal funds are not used for abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered), consistent with a longstanding Federal statutory restriction that is commonly known as the Hyde Amendment.   The purpose of this Executive Order is to establish a comprehensive, government-wide set of policies and procedures to achieve this goal and to make certain that all relevant actors-Federal officials, state officials (including insurance regulators) and health care providers-are aware of their responsibilities, new and old.
The Act maintains current Hyde Amendment restrictions governing abortion policy and extends those restrictions to the newly-created health insurance exchanges.  Under the Act, longstanding Federal laws to protect conscience (such as the Church Amendment, 42 U.S.C. §300a-7, and the Weldon Amendment, Pub. L. No. 111-8, §508(d)(1) (2009)) remain intact and new protections prohibit discrimination against health care facilities and health care providers because of an unwillingness to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.
Numerous executive agencies have a role in ensuring that these restrictions are enforced, including the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).  
Section 2.  Strict Compliance with Prohibitions on Abortion Funding in Health Insurance Exchanges. 
The Act specifically prohibits the use of tax credits and cost-sharing reduction payments to pay for abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered) in the health insurance exchanges that will be operational in 2014.  The Act also imposes strict payment and accounting requirements to ensure that Federal funds are not used for abortion services in exchange plans (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered) and requires state health insurance commissioners to ensure that exchange plan funds are segregated by insurance companies in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, OMB funds management circulars, and accounting guidance provided by the Government Accountability Office
I hereby direct the Director of OMB and the Secretary of HHS to develop, within 180 days of the date of this Executive Order, a model set of segregation guidelines for state health insurance commissioners to use when determining whether exchange plans are complying with the Act's segregation requirements, established in Section 1303 of the Act, for enrollees receiving Federal financial assistance.  The guidelines shall also offer technical information that states should follow to conduct independent regular audits of insurance companies that participate in the health insurance exchanges.  In developing these model guidelines, the Director of OMB and the Secretary of HHS shall consult with executive agencies and offices that have relevant expertise in accounting principles, including, but not limited to, the Department of the Treasury, and with the Government Accountability Office.  Upon completion of those model guidelines, the Secretary of HHS should promptly initiate a rulemaking to issue regulations, which will have the force of law, to interpret the Act's segregation requirements, and shall provide guidance to state health insurance commissioners on how to comply with the model guidelines.
Section 3.  Community Health Center Program.  
The Act establishes a new Community Health Center (CHC) Fund within HHS, which provides additional Federal funds for the community health center program.  Existing law prohibits these centers from using federal funds to provide abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered), as a result of both the Hyde Amendment and longstanding regulations containing the Hyde language.  Under the Act, the Hyde language shall apply to the authorization and appropriations of funds for Community Health Centers under section 10503 and all other relevant provisions.  I hereby direct the Secretary of HHS to ensure that program administrators and recipients of Federal funds are aware of and comply with the limitations on abortion services imposed on CHCs by existing law.  Such actions should include, but are not limited to, updating Grant Policy Statements that accompany CHC grants and issuing new interpretive rules.
Section 4.  General Provisions.  
(a) Nothing in this Executive Order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:  (i) authority granted by law or presidential directive to an agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This Executive Order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This Executive Order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity against the United States, its departments, agencies, entities, officers, employees or agents, or any other person.
THE WHITE HOUSE

How to Fix Healthcare


First of all, most people fail to realize what's breaking our system right now.  In the United States, anyone with or without insurance can go to a hospital emergency room and receive quality medical treatment.  This includes illegal aliens.  Sounds like everyone's getting health care to me!  There are two major reasons health care costs are rising, and neither one of them is an "evil" insurance company.

The first is frivolous lawsuits.  Insane amounts of money have been awarded for medical malpractice suits.  The result is higher malpractice insurance premiums.  Doctors didn't go to school for 10 years to be poor, they're going to pass the cost on to you, and who could blame them?  TORT reform would stop this problem in it's tracks, and has done so in Texas.  Of course, Democrats won't entertain this idea, because their lawyer buddies can't keep making a killing off of lawsuits.

Another alternative is to stop treating millions of illegal aliens for free.  After all, we're paying higher prices so doctors and nurses don't go broke treating them for free!  Once again, honest taxpayers pay the cost through increased health care pricing to cover the loss of treating illegal aliens for free.  Now, I'm not heartless.  If an illegal alien really needs treatment, we should oblige.  Then, to be even nicer, we can give them a free ride home (deportation) to their homeland.  That way, we can still treat these people if they really need it, but I don't think it's fair for taxpayers to subsidize in illegal aliens trip to the emergency room for a runny nose, and I'd bet we would see too many minor medical problems in a place they were never supposed to be:  The EMERGENCY room.

Now, I'm sure some of you are thinking, surely these illegal aliens get handed a medical bill.  You're right, they do.  Who's going to make them pay it?  It's not as if you can "ruin their credit" if they don't.  It's kinda like ol' Barry Obama's idea to tax oil companies to punish them for their success.  Ultimately, it will be a tax on oil consumers, because oil companies will just pass the cost of the tax on to us.  They'll just consider it part of their overhead, and it won't affect their profit margin.

Of course, this is what happens when people who know absolutely nothing about running a business (government) start telling businesses how to run their business.  These jack-holes have never made a payroll, never even been in charge of anything remotely profitable, but they know what's best.

Keep in mind that both TORT Reform and and enforcing immigration laws are a hell of a lot more constitutional than this garbage congress is trying to push through.  With two thirds of the government willing to ignore and dismiss The Constitution, only the judicial will be able to save us from this government takeover of yet another sector of our economy.

Also, with 34 states already invoking the 10th amendment to opt-out of health care reform, a failure by the judicial branch to uphold The Constitution may even result in civil war.  I could be wrong, perhaps Americans can tolerate totalitarian tyranny these days, but I recall from history class that we started this country to free ourselves from tyranny.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Stafford Hospital caused ‘unimaginable suffering’

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article7039285.ece

Patients were routinely neglected or left “sobbing and humiliated” by staff at an NHS trust where at least 400 deaths have been linked to appalling care.

This is what we'll get when we socialize healthcare.  If they insist, at least put Congress and the rest of the Government on the same plan as the rest of us.  If it's good enough for me, it's good enough for them.




'It's my health, it's my choice,' Danny Williams says

Newfoundland Premier says he did some soul searching before opting to have heart surgery in Florida



http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/its-my-health-its-my-choice-danny-williams-says/article1477872/#

He better hurry before we have Obamacare.

House votes to kill antitrust exemption for health insurers

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/24/health.antitrust/

Anyone wonder what sweetheart deal was struck to give insurance companies anti-trust exemptions in the first place?

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Neither Party Gets It, STILL!

Healthcare is easily taken care of, without any of the reforms the two parties.  The reason our healthcare is in shambles and ridiculously over-burdened with costs is in plain sight in just about any emergency room.  Illegal aliens know we'll provide medical attention to them for free at the emergency room.  Now, I have no problem with providing them immediate medical attention, but if they can't produce documents explaining who they are or why they're here, they should be turned over to the border patrol.  This will prevent our emergency rooms from having to endure huge crowds caused by people with a cough, or runny nose.  Why shell out money, they'll do it for free at the emergency room.  Like Michelle Obama says:  “The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more.” Michelle Obama.  What the First Lady clearly doesn't realize is that is already happening, and that's the problem.  Honest taxpaying citizens are having their wallets cyphoned for healthcare because let's face it, they need to make up the money somewhere.  Poor people in this country have Medicaid, so what's the problem?  I see a lot of blame being thrown at insurance companies, but we all know doctors don't come cheap, and insurance companies have to make payroll just like any other company, while still turning a profit.  While the alternative ideas from Republicans looks promising, I don't see an answer for the huge money-pit in our emergency room.  I suspect neither party is willing to tackle this because businesses utilize illegal immigrants constantly, alienating all businesses that thrive on cheap labor.  At the same time, the name-calling Democratic Party will cry racism, and apparently Republicans think we're stupid enough to believe that garbage.  There's  nothing racist about giving illegal aliens free healthcare, and then asking them to leave.  I don't care if they're here illegally from any country, any race, any religion.  No exceptions, it's illegal, that's it.  Pay your dues, get your green card, get your citizenship, and pay into the system that allows you to thrive and prosper so much more.  You'll notice Americans treating you like you're one of them more and more.  Now, it'd be nice if you'd learn English like ol' Teddy Roosevelt suggests in the quote below, but since we've not declared it our national language (much to my disappointment), I can only hope you're excited enough about being an american to learn it.  I think everything else Teddy said rings true though.

"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."


Theodore Roosevelt 1907



"They're doin' the jobs the american people don't wanna do."

George W. Bush
There, I've given both sides now that I've quoted ol W.


Saturday, January 2, 2010

Ben Nelson to Henry McMaster: 'Call off the dogs' - Alex Isenstadt - POLITICO.com

Ben Nelson to Henry McMaster: 'Call off the dogs' - Alex Isenstadt - POLITICO.com

Here we go..... Ben Nelson is upset that the constitutionality of his kickbacks are being investigated. He says they weren't his idea, yet refused to sign on to the healthcare bill until those kickbacks were in place. Now, I may not be as politically savvy as some, but I'm smart enough to figure out why this guy is backing away. Latest poll numbers show Nelson would be defeated solidly in the election if it were held today.

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Baucus tries to fill Kennedy's shoes as Senate Drunk


Wow, this is what the good people of Montana have as a representative?

 I'd like to make fun of them, but we have a congresswoman here by the name of Sheila Jackson Lee.  This character, decided to fly all the way to Michael Jackson's funeral on taxpayer money, and to add insult to injury, she even spoke at the memorial.  I don't have a problem with here attending Jackson's memorial, until she forces taxpayers to pick up the tab for a trip that served no one in her district.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Sunrise votes nudge health care bill forward Tues.

Sunrise votes nudge health care bill forward Tues.

I guess there's no shame in jamming this through.  Patriots everywhere are stocking up on tar and feathers right now.

Monday, December 21, 2009

Time to take a stand!

I don't know who's with me, and I don't care.  I will not be forced to buy insurance.  I will not submit to tyranny!  They say they're going to throw me in jail if I don't buy insurance, big deal?  Freedom is being able to choose not only which insurance, but also the ability not to buy any at all. 
I have medical insurance.  It's not the best, it's over-priced, and it eats a lot of my paycheck.  Just because it's a good idea doesn't mean the government should MAKE someone do it.  I take issue with a government exercising tyranny.  I take issue with a nanny state that tells you what to do from cradle to grave.  I take issue with all 435 members of Congress, who excluded themselves from such tyranny. 

National Healthcare is not the will of We the People, so you get the tar, I'll grab the feathers!