Executive Order 13524 of December 16, 2009
Amending Executive Order 12425 Designating Interpol as a
Public International Organization Entitled To Enjoy Certain
Privileges, Exemptions, and Immunities
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the
laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International
Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the
appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International
Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive
Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting
from the first sentence the words ‘‘except those provided by Section 2(c),
Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act’’ and the semicolon
that immediately precedes them.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 16, 2009.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now here's the EO Obama is amending:
Executive Order 12425
by Ronald Reagan
International Criminal Police Organizations
Delivered on 16 June 1983.
By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States, including Section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669, 22 U.S.C. 288), it is hereby ordered that the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), in which the United States participates pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 263a, is hereby designated as a public international organization entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions and immunities conferred by the International Organizations Immunities Act; except those provided by Section 2(c), the portions of Section 2(d) and Section 3 relating to customs duties and federal internal-revenue importation taxes, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act. This designation is not intended to abridge in any respect the privileges, exemptions or immunities which such organization may have acquired or may acquire by international agreement or by Congressional action.
RONALD REAGAN
The White House,
June 16,1983.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kinda makes you wonder why we have the Freedom of Information Act. What good is it if everyone is immune?
Showing posts with label Barrack Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Barrack Obama. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Rubin Reports - I just had to share this
Dramatic New Evidence On Major Nidal Hasan and the Fort Hood Terror Attack
Our suspicions are confirmed Major Nidal Hasan is a terrorist, traitor. Just the kind of person you'd expect on Obama's Homeland Security Transitional Team.
Be sure to follow Rubin Reports
Our suspicions are confirmed Major Nidal Hasan is a terrorist, traitor. Just the kind of person you'd expect on Obama's Homeland Security Transitional Team.
Be sure to follow Rubin Reports
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Friday, December 18, 2009
A sign of the times
It's interesting this book has a foreword by Ron Paul. As a Constitutionalist, he's one of the few congressmen I trust. It's a shame he isn't a stronger public speaker. Now, I do take issue with the cover of this book, because it doesn't give due credit to George W. Bush for making it all possible. Dubya proved just how much you can get away with when he bailed out the financial sector. The amazing thing about the Obama technique, is he campaigned against Bush who wasn't eligible for the job anymore. Then, after winning the White House, he governs much like Bush. Very secretive, he had a closed door meeting on government transparency. Also, bailouts and kick-backs to Goldman-Sachs, who has rigged the system in their favor by establishing a former employer in our Treasury over and over again. The insane difference is how fast Obama has grabbed his power, and he seems to have tipped his hand to most Americans judging by his current approval ratings.
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Warning, misleading headline: Minister: Obamacare kills African-American babies
Minister: Obamacare kills African-American babies.
Well, the minister did say that, but he was talking about abortion, not infanticide. Once again, WND let's me down with a misleading "shock" headline, but the numbers in this story are quite staggering to me. 10.8% white pregnancies end in abortion, 33.4% of black pregnancies. So, a human fetus has at least a 10.8% chance of being killed by another human before they even see the light of day. Kinda makes you feel lucky your mother didn't exercise her "right to choose."
Well, the minister did say that, but he was talking about abortion, not infanticide. Once again, WND let's me down with a misleading "shock" headline, but the numbers in this story are quite staggering to me. 10.8% white pregnancies end in abortion, 33.4% of black pregnancies. So, a human fetus has at least a 10.8% chance of being killed by another human before they even see the light of day. Kinda makes you feel lucky your mother didn't exercise her "right to choose."
President Obama: Federal Government 'Will Go Bankrupt' if Health Care Costs Are Not Reined In - The World Newser
President Obama: Federal Government 'Will Go Bankrupt' if Health Care Costs Are Not Reined In - The World Newser
More fear-mongering, big surprise. Yeah, the world's oceans will boil if we don't do something about global warming, right? If we don't bail out banks the economy will collapse right? Obama will keep selling it as long as you keep buying it!
More fear-mongering, big surprise. Yeah, the world's oceans will boil if we don't do something about global warming, right? If we don't bail out banks the economy will collapse right? Obama will keep selling it as long as you keep buying it!
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Media Matters Responds To Fistgate VII: “Shame On Kevin Jennings And GLSEN”
Media Matters Responds To Fistgate VII: “Shame On Kevin Jennings And GLSEN”
I'm an open-minded guy, if people want to do this crap with each other, I have no problem with it. I do take issue with teaching this sort of behavior to children, especially with our tax dollars. Shame on Kevin Jennings, shame on Barrack Obama, and shame on all of us for having any tolerance for this garbage in our classrooms. Kids today may not be able to solve simple algebra problems, but at least they know what fisting is.
I'm an open-minded guy, if people want to do this crap with each other, I have no problem with it. I do take issue with teaching this sort of behavior to children, especially with our tax dollars. Shame on Kevin Jennings, shame on Barrack Obama, and shame on all of us for having any tolerance for this garbage in our classrooms. Kids today may not be able to solve simple algebra problems, but at least they know what fisting is.
Birther movement will not go away
The Birther movement is still going after a year, something that could've been decided before the election with as little as $12. For some reason, Obama does not feel compelled to show this document in the face of hundreds of lawsuits, and 12 citizen grand jury indictments. Granted, Obama has not lost a case yet, but I can't see how he would. Courts are not the proper venue to challenge the president's eligibility.
Unfortunately, I can't defeat the birther argument, they make valid points. One of which is, why not release his vault copy long form birth certificate? Now, I know what a lot of people are screaming at their computer: "He posted it online!" First, Obama didn't post anything, Factcheck.org did. Second, Factcheck.org is owned by liberals in association with the annenberg group, hardly unbiased. Third, the two people Factcheck.org sent to verify Obama's Certification of Live Birth had no training in forensic document analysis. Fourth, when Congress verified the election results, Dick Cheney failed to call for objections.
Now, for you to understand why Obama's online birth certificate is unacceptable, you need to understand what the birthers are after. The document posted on Factcheck.org is called a certification of live birth. This document does not include the birth hospital, or any signatures from witnesses of the birth. It is computer generated based on information found on the Vault Copy Birth Certificate. Here's an example of what birthers are looking for:
Attn Mr. Eric Holder
United States Attorney General
950 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington DC 20530-0001 USA
Dear Mr. Holder,
On March 1st on behalf of my clients I have submitted to you a request to file Quo Warranto against Mr. Barack Hussein Obama. The request was filed due to following troubling facts:
1. According to a number of licensed investigators National Databases show Mr. Obama using as many as 39 different Social Security numbers, which included the numbers of deceased individuals and numbers never assigned.
2. Number 042-68-4425 that Mr. Obama used for most of his life and is currently using while residing in the White House, is a number assigned to an individual born in 1890, who resided in the state of Connecticut and this Social Security number was issued in the state of Connecticut where Mr. Obama never resided.
3. One of the leading forensic experts in the country Ms. Sandra Ramsey Lines has prepared an affidavit, stating that Mr. Obama’s short version Certification of Life Birth cannot be treated as genuine without seeing the original on file in the Health Department in HI.
4. The state of Hawaii since 1911 had in its statutes a provision allowing Foreign born children of Hawaiian residents of get Hawaiian Birth Certificates(currently statute 338-17) and currently statute 338-5 allows one to get a birth certificate based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence from the hospital.
5. In spite of over 100 law suits filed around the country and 12 Citizen Grand Jury indictments Mr. Obama refused to sign a consent to unseal his original birth certificate currently sealed in the Health Department of the state of Hawaii and all the other vital records.
6. Ms. Chiuomi Fukino, Director of the Health Department of the State of Hawaii has provided a statement that there is a document on file in Hawaii, however she refused to provide any information, as to what document is on file: whether it is a Birth Certificate given to a foreign born child of Hawaiian resident, whether it is an amended Birth certificate, obtained when Mr. Obama was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather. She refused to answer any questions as to whether his birth certificate was obtained based on a proper hospital birth certificate or based on a statement of one of his relatives only, which needs to be corroborated.
7. Regardless of place of birth of Mr. Obama, since birth and until now Mr. Obama had a split allegiance. He had British citizenship at birth, Kenyan since age 2 and Indonesian since age 5. Allegiance to other Nations goes as a clear violation of the Natural citizenship clause of the article 2 section 1 of the Constitution.
8. Under the Freedom of Information act 5 US 552, since no response was provided to numerous certified mail letters received by your office nine months ago, I demand a written response or Administrative hearing on the matter within 30 days. On behalf of my clients I demand an answer, as to when the Quo Warranto against Mr. Obama will be filed by the US Attorney General office, or in the alternative if the Attorney General office refuses to file Quo Warranto, I demand an ex-relator status for my clients to proceed with the Quo Warranto action against Mr. Obama in the DC court or the Supreme Court of the United States.
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
Counsel to the plaintiffs-ex relators.
Attachment
Quo Warranto request, Dossiers
Seems like enough to at least be suspicious, what do you think? Does the media keep trying to kill this story because it's true? CNN tried several times to kill the story, and even fired Lou Dobbs for bringing it up. CNN even falsely claimed that Obama's vault copy birth certificate had been destroyed, which was quickly corrected by the Hawaii DoH when questioned about it.
Now that Obama has the Presidency, he should be held to his pledge to bring transparency to government. Let's start with the Commander-in-Chief's credentials, shall we?
Unfortunately, I can't defeat the birther argument, they make valid points. One of which is, why not release his vault copy long form birth certificate? Now, I know what a lot of people are screaming at their computer: "He posted it online!" First, Obama didn't post anything, Factcheck.org did. Second, Factcheck.org is owned by liberals in association with the annenberg group, hardly unbiased. Third, the two people Factcheck.org sent to verify Obama's Certification of Live Birth had no training in forensic document analysis. Fourth, when Congress verified the election results, Dick Cheney failed to call for objections.
Now, for you to understand why Obama's online birth certificate is unacceptable, you need to understand what the birthers are after. The document posted on Factcheck.org is called a certification of live birth. This document does not include the birth hospital, or any signatures from witnesses of the birth. It is computer generated based on information found on the Vault Copy Birth Certificate. Here's an example of what birthers are looking for:
As you can see, the document birthers are after has much more information, as well as signatures. This particular BC was issued very close to Obama's supposed birthday. Now, perhaps you understand what the fuss is about. No President has ever refused to release birth documents, and school records. Before the election John McCain released his less than stellar academic records, as well as his birth certificate. Why Obama can't seem to do the same thing is beyond me, and only rouses suspicion. This is why the birther movement has not subsided. Unfortunately, that will still not satisfy some. Some birthers claim the proof is not in where Obama was born, but in his parentage. Fathered by a subject of the UK, birthers claim Obama is disqualified by the Constitution no matter where he was born because of divided allegiences.
Now that we have the background established, we can get to birther lawyer Orly Taitz's open letter to Attorney General Eric Holder:
12.14.09. Via Certified Mail
Attn Mr. Eric Holder
United States Attorney General
950 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington DC 20530-0001 USA
Dear Mr. Holder,
On March 1st on behalf of my clients I have submitted to you a request to file Quo Warranto against Mr. Barack Hussein Obama. The request was filed due to following troubling facts:
1. According to a number of licensed investigators National Databases show Mr. Obama using as many as 39 different Social Security numbers, which included the numbers of deceased individuals and numbers never assigned.
2. Number 042-68-4425 that Mr. Obama used for most of his life and is currently using while residing in the White House, is a number assigned to an individual born in 1890, who resided in the state of Connecticut and this Social Security number was issued in the state of Connecticut where Mr. Obama never resided.
3. One of the leading forensic experts in the country Ms. Sandra Ramsey Lines has prepared an affidavit, stating that Mr. Obama’s short version Certification of Life Birth cannot be treated as genuine without seeing the original on file in the Health Department in HI.
4. The state of Hawaii since 1911 had in its statutes a provision allowing Foreign born children of Hawaiian residents of get Hawaiian Birth Certificates(currently statute 338-17) and currently statute 338-5 allows one to get a birth certificate based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence from the hospital.
5. In spite of over 100 law suits filed around the country and 12 Citizen Grand Jury indictments Mr. Obama refused to sign a consent to unseal his original birth certificate currently sealed in the Health Department of the state of Hawaii and all the other vital records.
6. Ms. Chiuomi Fukino, Director of the Health Department of the State of Hawaii has provided a statement that there is a document on file in Hawaii, however she refused to provide any information, as to what document is on file: whether it is a Birth Certificate given to a foreign born child of Hawaiian resident, whether it is an amended Birth certificate, obtained when Mr. Obama was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather. She refused to answer any questions as to whether his birth certificate was obtained based on a proper hospital birth certificate or based on a statement of one of his relatives only, which needs to be corroborated.
7. Regardless of place of birth of Mr. Obama, since birth and until now Mr. Obama had a split allegiance. He had British citizenship at birth, Kenyan since age 2 and Indonesian since age 5. Allegiance to other Nations goes as a clear violation of the Natural citizenship clause of the article 2 section 1 of the Constitution.
8. Under the Freedom of Information act 5 US 552, since no response was provided to numerous certified mail letters received by your office nine months ago, I demand a written response or Administrative hearing on the matter within 30 days. On behalf of my clients I demand an answer, as to when the Quo Warranto against Mr. Obama will be filed by the US Attorney General office, or in the alternative if the Attorney General office refuses to file Quo Warranto, I demand an ex-relator status for my clients to proceed with the Quo Warranto action against Mr. Obama in the DC court or the Supreme Court of the United States.
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
Counsel to the plaintiffs-ex relators.
Attachment
Quo Warranto request, Dossiers
Seems like enough to at least be suspicious, what do you think? Does the media keep trying to kill this story because it's true? CNN tried several times to kill the story, and even fired Lou Dobbs for bringing it up. CNN even falsely claimed that Obama's vault copy birth certificate had been destroyed, which was quickly corrected by the Hawaii DoH when questioned about it.
Now that Obama has the Presidency, he should be held to his pledge to bring transparency to government. Let's start with the Commander-in-Chief's credentials, shall we?
Monday, December 14, 2009
The Coming Soldier Revolt
How long can we ask our bravest to continue this blood-money farce in Afghanistan and Iraq? They signed up to serve us, but end up wiping iraqi & aghani asses and taking care of their problems for them. These countries are just filled with people that hate us, yet we continue to "kill them with kindness." Unfortunately, that kindness and political correctness has proved the most deadly weapon against our soldiers. After what happened at Ft. Hood, it's obvious the military is worried much more about political correctness than the security and safety of our troops. Sure, we could've removed Hassan before he brutally murdered 13 adults and 1 unborn innocent child, but that might hurt muslims' feelings, and we can't have that!
Worst of all is the suicidal rules of engagement(ROE) for our troops. The actual ROEs are said to be classified U.S. and NATO secrets, but based on individual soldier accounts, those restrictions include the following:
No night or surprise searches
Villagers are to be warned prior to searches
Afghan National Army, or ANA, or Afghan National Police, or ANP, must accompany U.S. units on searches
U.S. soldiers may not fire at insurgents unless they are preparing to fire first
U.S. forces cannot engage insurgents if civilians are present
Only women can search women
Troops can fire on insurgents if they catch them placing an IED but not if insurgents walk away from where the explosives are.
So, anyone out there really believe we can win this? It's obvious our leaders don't have the stomach for what must be done. After all, the guy in charge has waited 3 months to do what his hand-picked general told him to do in the first place. 3 months of soldiers dying, families weeping for their lost sons and daughters, before Barack Hussein Obama could even decide on a strategy at all.
How can we keep asking our soldiers and our families to endure this? How long can they stay loyal to a man that doesn't seem loyal to the Constitution they've all been sworn to uphold? Would you go to war under the ROEs listed above?
Worst of all is the suicidal rules of engagement(ROE) for our troops. The actual ROEs are said to be classified U.S. and NATO secrets, but based on individual soldier accounts, those restrictions include the following:
No night or surprise searches
Villagers are to be warned prior to searches
Afghan National Army, or ANA, or Afghan National Police, or ANP, must accompany U.S. units on searches
U.S. soldiers may not fire at insurgents unless they are preparing to fire first
U.S. forces cannot engage insurgents if civilians are present
Only women can search women
Troops can fire on insurgents if they catch them placing an IED but not if insurgents walk away from where the explosives are.
So, anyone out there really believe we can win this? It's obvious our leaders don't have the stomach for what must be done. After all, the guy in charge has waited 3 months to do what his hand-picked general told him to do in the first place. 3 months of soldiers dying, families weeping for their lost sons and daughters, before Barack Hussein Obama could even decide on a strategy at all.
How can we keep asking our soldiers and our families to endure this? How long can they stay loyal to a man that doesn't seem loyal to the Constitution they've all been sworn to uphold? Would you go to war under the ROEs listed above?
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
New Obama plans: 'spend our way out' of downturn
New Obama plans: 'spend our way out' of downturn
We're through the looking glass people. Up is down, left is right, right is wrong, thin is fat, and short is long. We're gonna spend our way out of debt!
We're through the looking glass people. Up is down, left is right, right is wrong, thin is fat, and short is long. We're gonna spend our way out of debt!
Monday, December 7, 2009
Commander & Thief holds secret meeting on transparency
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CE09T80&show_article=1=1
Note the opacity of Obama's transparency
Note the opacity of Obama's transparency
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Monday, November 23, 2009
Friday, November 20, 2009
Gee, another crook in Washington
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091118/ap_on_bi_ge/us_nominee_tax_problems
Birds of a feather flock together, and so do crooks, which is why Obama keeps hiring them.
Birds of a feather flock together, and so do crooks, which is why Obama keeps hiring them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
