Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Live Free or Die!
Read the bill: Obamacare socks middle class with $3.9 billion tax increase | Washington Examiner
Read the bill: Obamacare socks middle class with $3.9 billion tax increase Washington Examiner
One more small detail they forgot to tell you about in the health care bill:
Taxpayers earning less than $200,000 a year will pay roughly $3.9 billion more in taxes — in 2019 alone — because of healthcare reform, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation, Congress’ official scorekeeper for legislation.
The new law raises $15.2 billion over 10 years by limiting the medical expense deduction, a provision widely used by taxpayers who either have a serious illness or are older.
Taxpayers can currently deduct medical expenses in excess of 7.5 percent of their adjusted gross income. Starting in 2013, most taxpayers will only be allowed to deducted expenses greater than 10 percent of AGI. Older taxpayers are hit by this threshold increase in 2017.
This is worse than a tax on the middle class. It’s a tax on the middle class who are seriously ill. And what’s the over/under on how may times Obama is going to break that “no taxes on anyone earning under $250,000 a year” pledge, anyway?
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/read-the-bill-obamacare-socks-middle-class-with-39-billion-tax-increase.html#ixzz0l0N5ks55
One more small detail they forgot to tell you about in the health care bill:
Taxpayers earning less than $200,000 a year will pay roughly $3.9 billion more in taxes — in 2019 alone — because of healthcare reform, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation, Congress’ official scorekeeper for legislation.
The new law raises $15.2 billion over 10 years by limiting the medical expense deduction, a provision widely used by taxpayers who either have a serious illness or are older.
Taxpayers can currently deduct medical expenses in excess of 7.5 percent of their adjusted gross income. Starting in 2013, most taxpayers will only be allowed to deducted expenses greater than 10 percent of AGI. Older taxpayers are hit by this threshold increase in 2017.
This is worse than a tax on the middle class. It’s a tax on the middle class who are seriously ill. And what’s the over/under on how may times Obama is going to break that “no taxes on anyone earning under $250,000 a year” pledge, anyway?
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/read-the-bill-obamacare-socks-middle-class-with-39-billion-tax-increase.html#ixzz0l0N5ks55
MSNBC's Norah O'Donnell Plays Race Card on Gingrich, Colleagues Laugh At Her | NewsBusters.org
MSNBC's Norah O'Donnell Plays Race Card on Gingrich, Colleagues Laugh At Her NewsBusters.org
MSNBC’s Norah O’Donnell on Friday went too far for even her colleagues at the liberal cable channel, receiving mockery for her assertion that Newt Gingrich made racially charged remarks about Barack Obama. At the Southern Republican Leadership Conference, Thursday, the former House Speaker commented that “shooting three-point shots may be clever, but it doesn’t put anybody to work.”Speaking of the President’s basketball skills, Gingrich continued: "What we need is a President, not an athlete. We need somebody who actually focuses on getting people back to work.” After the clip was played, Morning Joe guest host O’Donnell lobbed her accusation at Gingrich:
But I’m not sure what he means by this particular soundbite and I think it’s open to some criticism because it suggests that the President is an athlete and some people may suggest, you know, because all black people are good athletes. I mean that’s what it sort of sounds like to me.
The rest of the Morning Joe panel scoffed at O’Donnell’s claim, erupting in a flurry of dismissiveness.“Oh, I didn’t see that at all,” claimed Guthrie.“I didn’t get that (impression),” asserted Barnicle.“That went right by me!” proclaimed Pat Buchanan, laughing.While the rest of panel laughed it off, O’Donnell pressed on with her criticism, asking, “Well what’s this suggestion about him playing basketball? That he’s not doing his job?”But the panel continued to ignore O’Donnell, electing instead to joke about Obama’s athletic abilities.“You can easily disprove that President Obama is an athlete by showing his first pitch,” sneered Barnicle. “You can show that clip. He is not an athlete.”“You can show him at the bowling alley in Pennsylvania!” suggested Buchanan.O’Donnell’s lone defender was the Washington Post’s Jonathan Capehart, who declared, “Norah, I will back you up, because my eyebrow arched as well.”In the end, O’Donnell’s attempt to further the argument that Republicans, particularly Southern Republicans, are racist backfired. Instead of making Republicans look radical, O’Donnell made herself look like a fringe liberal.The transcript for the segment, which aired Friday, April 9, can be found below:
SAVANNAH GUTHRIE: We played Newt Gingrich’s comments at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference last night; let’s play it again because I know Norah wanted to get in on this. Let’s play it in case anybody missed it.
NEWT GINGRICH, former Speaker of the House: Will presently sink in on people that, you know, shooting three-point shots may be clever, but it doesn’t put anybody to work. And what we need is a President, not an athlete. We need somebody who actually focuses on getting people back to work.
GUTHRIE: O.K. Norah O’Donnell.
NORAH O’DONNELL: I mean this was largely a good speech. Gingrich’s speech about not being the party of no, let’s be yes on this, yes on this. But I’m not sure what he means by this particular soundbite and I think it’s open to some criticism because it suggests that the President is an athlete and some people may suggest, you know, because all black people are good athletes. I mean that’s what it sort of sounds like to me.
GUTHRIE: Oh, I didn’t see that at all.
MIKE BARNICLE: Oh, I didn’t get that.
GUTHRIE: Yeah I didn’t hear that!
PAT BUCHANAN: That went right by me! Hahahaha.
JONATHAN CAPEHART, Washington Post: Norah, I will back you up, because my eyebrow arched as well. But let’s put this in perspective. The president does play basketball, he did, you know, do a three-pointer.
O’DONNELL: Well what’s this suggestion about him playing basketball? That he’s not doing his job?
CAPEHART: I know! I know!
GUTHRIE: That’s what I thought was odd about it as though we see him on the basketball court all the time, actually it’s the golf course where we see him at.
BUCHANAN: He just had that one-on-one with the fellow shooting three point shots and stuff.
BARNICLE: You can easily disprove that President Obama is an athlete by showing his first pitch. (Laughter) You can show that clip. He is not an athlete.
BUCHANAN: You can show him at the bowling alley in Pennsylvania.
GUTHRIE: Yeah maybe the DNC could do a whole ad around that as a counter argument to what Gingrich said.
O’DONNELL: Well what does that mean we need a president not an athlete?
BARNICLE: I think it’s a typical Newt Gingrich cheap shot. I didn’t read into the–
GUTHRIE: I didn’t hear it either. But we’re insensitive aren’t we? We don’t know.
CAPEHART: I’m with you (O’Donnell). It’s not like the guy’s on the court all the time.
MSNBC’s Norah O’Donnell on Friday went too far for even her colleagues at the liberal cable channel, receiving mockery for her assertion that Newt Gingrich made racially charged remarks about Barack Obama. At the Southern Republican Leadership Conference, Thursday, the former House Speaker commented that “shooting three-point shots may be clever, but it doesn’t put anybody to work.”Speaking of the President’s basketball skills, Gingrich continued: "What we need is a President, not an athlete. We need somebody who actually focuses on getting people back to work.” After the clip was played, Morning Joe guest host O’Donnell lobbed her accusation at Gingrich:
But I’m not sure what he means by this particular soundbite and I think it’s open to some criticism because it suggests that the President is an athlete and some people may suggest, you know, because all black people are good athletes. I mean that’s what it sort of sounds like to me.
The rest of the Morning Joe panel scoffed at O’Donnell’s claim, erupting in a flurry of dismissiveness.“Oh, I didn’t see that at all,” claimed Guthrie.“I didn’t get that (impression),” asserted Barnicle.“That went right by me!” proclaimed Pat Buchanan, laughing.While the rest of panel laughed it off, O’Donnell pressed on with her criticism, asking, “Well what’s this suggestion about him playing basketball? That he’s not doing his job?”But the panel continued to ignore O’Donnell, electing instead to joke about Obama’s athletic abilities.“You can easily disprove that President Obama is an athlete by showing his first pitch,” sneered Barnicle. “You can show that clip. He is not an athlete.”“You can show him at the bowling alley in Pennsylvania!” suggested Buchanan.O’Donnell’s lone defender was the Washington Post’s Jonathan Capehart, who declared, “Norah, I will back you up, because my eyebrow arched as well.”In the end, O’Donnell’s attempt to further the argument that Republicans, particularly Southern Republicans, are racist backfired. Instead of making Republicans look radical, O’Donnell made herself look like a fringe liberal.The transcript for the segment, which aired Friday, April 9, can be found below:
SAVANNAH GUTHRIE: We played Newt Gingrich’s comments at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference last night; let’s play it again because I know Norah wanted to get in on this. Let’s play it in case anybody missed it.
NEWT GINGRICH, former Speaker of the House: Will presently sink in on people that, you know, shooting three-point shots may be clever, but it doesn’t put anybody to work. And what we need is a President, not an athlete. We need somebody who actually focuses on getting people back to work.
GUTHRIE: O.K. Norah O’Donnell.
NORAH O’DONNELL: I mean this was largely a good speech. Gingrich’s speech about not being the party of no, let’s be yes on this, yes on this. But I’m not sure what he means by this particular soundbite and I think it’s open to some criticism because it suggests that the President is an athlete and some people may suggest, you know, because all black people are good athletes. I mean that’s what it sort of sounds like to me.
GUTHRIE: Oh, I didn’t see that at all.
MIKE BARNICLE: Oh, I didn’t get that.
GUTHRIE: Yeah I didn’t hear that!
PAT BUCHANAN: That went right by me! Hahahaha.
JONATHAN CAPEHART, Washington Post: Norah, I will back you up, because my eyebrow arched as well. But let’s put this in perspective. The president does play basketball, he did, you know, do a three-pointer.
O’DONNELL: Well what’s this suggestion about him playing basketball? That he’s not doing his job?
CAPEHART: I know! I know!
GUTHRIE: That’s what I thought was odd about it as though we see him on the basketball court all the time, actually it’s the golf course where we see him at.
BUCHANAN: He just had that one-on-one with the fellow shooting three point shots and stuff.
BARNICLE: You can easily disprove that President Obama is an athlete by showing his first pitch. (Laughter) You can show that clip. He is not an athlete.
BUCHANAN: You can show him at the bowling alley in Pennsylvania.
GUTHRIE: Yeah maybe the DNC could do a whole ad around that as a counter argument to what Gingrich said.
O’DONNELL: Well what does that mean we need a president not an athlete?
BARNICLE: I think it’s a typical Newt Gingrich cheap shot. I didn’t read into the–
GUTHRIE: I didn’t hear it either. But we’re insensitive aren’t we? We don’t know.
CAPEHART: I’m with you (O’Donnell). It’s not like the guy’s on the court all the time.
Western Hero: Liberal Anger We Can Believe In
Western Hero: Liberal Anger We Can Believe In
Here are the factors that accompany liberal unhappiness:
- Secularism
- Overreliance on government to solve problems
- An addiction to security
Here are the things that make conservatives a happier group:
- Faith in God
- Work (job satisfaction)
- Marriage and Family
- Charitable giving and volunteering
- Freedom (economic, political, religious)
Here are the factors that accompany liberal unhappiness:
- Secularism
- Overreliance on government to solve problems
- An addiction to security
Here are the things that make conservatives a happier group:
- Faith in God
- Work (job satisfaction)
- Marriage and Family
- Charitable giving and volunteering
- Freedom (economic, political, religious)
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Terry Lakin Letter to POTUS
http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/news/terry-lakins-letter-to-potus.html
March 30, 2010
The Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States of America
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. President:
For more than seventeen years, I have had the privilege of serving my country as a member of the U.S. Armed Forces, including overseas assignments in imminent danger/combat areas in Bosnia and Afghanistan.
The United States is an example to the rest of the world of a stable, civilized democratic government where all men are created equal and the rule of law is cherished and obeyed. The U.S. military teaches and promotes the rule of law and civilian control of the military to many other nations and militaries around the world. Every soldier learns what constitutes a lawful order and is encouraged to stand up and object to unlawful orders. My officer's oath of office requires that I swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.
I recently received deployment orders for a second deployment to Afghanistan. My orders included a requirement to bring copies of my birth certificate. I will provide a certified copy of my original birth certificate with common, standard identifiers, including the name of an attending physician and a hospital. Every day in transactions across the country, American citizens are required to prove their identity, and standards for identification have become even stricter since the terrorist attacks on 9/11.
Since the fall of 2008, I have been troubled by reports that your original birth certificate remains concealed from public view along with many other records which, if released, would quickly end questions surrounding your place of birth and "natural born" status. Many people mistake the online Certification of Live Birth for an original birth certificate. Until the summer of 2009, the Hawaiian Department of Homelands would not accept this Certification of Live Birth to determine native Hawaiian identity--the Department insisted upon also reviewing an original birth certificate. Many do not understand that the online document was from 2007, generated by computer, laser-printed, and merely a certification that there is an original birth certificate on file which may or may not be sufficiently probative. An original birth certificate is the underlying document that presumably includes a hospital and attending physician's or midwife's name that should lay to rest the "natural born" dispute.
In 2008, after pressure from the news media, Senator McCain produced an original birth certificate from the Panama Canal Zone; a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing examined and affirmed his "natural born" status and Constitutional eligibility to serve as President. The U.S. Senate was silent about your eligibility, despite statements from Kenyan citizens that you were born in Mombasa, including your paternal grandmother and the Ambassador from Kenya to the U.S. during a radio interview. Hawaiian state officials claim they cannot release an original birth certificate without your consent.
I have attempted through my chain of command for many months to get answers to the questions surrounding your eligibility. I also sought answers, unsuccessfully, through my Congressional delegation. You serve as my Commander-in-Chief. Given the fact that the certification that your campaign posted online was not a document that the Hawaiian Department of Homelands regarded as a sufficient substitute for the original birth certificate and given that it has been your personal decision that has prevented the Hawaiian Department of Health from releasing your original birth certificate or any Hawaiian hospital from releasing your records, the burden of proof must rest with you.
Please assure the American people that you are indeed constitutionally eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief and thereby may lawfully direct service members into harm's way. I will be proud to deploy to Afghanistan to further serve my country and my fellow soldiers, but I should only do so with the knowledge that this important provision of our Constitution is respected and obeyed. The people that continue to risk their lives and give the ultimate sacrifice to the service of our country deserve to know they do so upholding their vows to the oath of office and the Constitution.
Unless it is established (by this sufficient proof that should be easily within your power to provide) that you are constitutionally eligible to serve as President and my Commander-in-Chief, I, and all other military officers may be following illegal orders. Therefore, sir, until an original birth certificate is brought forward that validates your eligibility and puts to rest the other reasonable questions surrounding your unproven eligibility; I cannot in good conscience obey ANY military orders.
Respectfully,
// Terry Lakin
Lieutenant Colonel Terrence Lakin, USA
The Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States of America
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. President:
For more than seventeen years, I have had the privilege of serving my country as a member of the U.S. Armed Forces, including overseas assignments in imminent danger/combat areas in Bosnia and Afghanistan.
The United States is an example to the rest of the world of a stable, civilized democratic government where all men are created equal and the rule of law is cherished and obeyed. The U.S. military teaches and promotes the rule of law and civilian control of the military to many other nations and militaries around the world. Every soldier learns what constitutes a lawful order and is encouraged to stand up and object to unlawful orders. My officer's oath of office requires that I swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.
I recently received deployment orders for a second deployment to Afghanistan. My orders included a requirement to bring copies of my birth certificate. I will provide a certified copy of my original birth certificate with common, standard identifiers, including the name of an attending physician and a hospital. Every day in transactions across the country, American citizens are required to prove their identity, and standards for identification have become even stricter since the terrorist attacks on 9/11.
Since the fall of 2008, I have been troubled by reports that your original birth certificate remains concealed from public view along with many other records which, if released, would quickly end questions surrounding your place of birth and "natural born" status. Many people mistake the online Certification of Live Birth for an original birth certificate. Until the summer of 2009, the Hawaiian Department of Homelands would not accept this Certification of Live Birth to determine native Hawaiian identity--the Department insisted upon also reviewing an original birth certificate. Many do not understand that the online document was from 2007, generated by computer, laser-printed, and merely a certification that there is an original birth certificate on file which may or may not be sufficiently probative. An original birth certificate is the underlying document that presumably includes a hospital and attending physician's or midwife's name that should lay to rest the "natural born" dispute.
In 2008, after pressure from the news media, Senator McCain produced an original birth certificate from the Panama Canal Zone; a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing examined and affirmed his "natural born" status and Constitutional eligibility to serve as President. The U.S. Senate was silent about your eligibility, despite statements from Kenyan citizens that you were born in Mombasa, including your paternal grandmother and the Ambassador from Kenya to the U.S. during a radio interview. Hawaiian state officials claim they cannot release an original birth certificate without your consent.
I have attempted through my chain of command for many months to get answers to the questions surrounding your eligibility. I also sought answers, unsuccessfully, through my Congressional delegation. You serve as my Commander-in-Chief. Given the fact that the certification that your campaign posted online was not a document that the Hawaiian Department of Homelands regarded as a sufficient substitute for the original birth certificate and given that it has been your personal decision that has prevented the Hawaiian Department of Health from releasing your original birth certificate or any Hawaiian hospital from releasing your records, the burden of proof must rest with you.
Please assure the American people that you are indeed constitutionally eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief and thereby may lawfully direct service members into harm's way. I will be proud to deploy to Afghanistan to further serve my country and my fellow soldiers, but I should only do so with the knowledge that this important provision of our Constitution is respected and obeyed. The people that continue to risk their lives and give the ultimate sacrifice to the service of our country deserve to know they do so upholding their vows to the oath of office and the Constitution.
Unless it is established (by this sufficient proof that should be easily within your power to provide) that you are constitutionally eligible to serve as President and my Commander-in-Chief, I, and all other military officers may be following illegal orders. Therefore, sir, until an original birth certificate is brought forward that validates your eligibility and puts to rest the other reasonable questions surrounding your unproven eligibility; I cannot in good conscience obey ANY military orders.
Respectfully,
// Terry Lakin
Lieutenant Colonel Terrence Lakin, USA
Friday, April 9, 2010
Affirmative Action is Racism
"I have a dream that my four little children will one
day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their
skin, but by the content of their character."--Martin Luther King Jr.
Sorry King, you're dream will have to wait.
Whether the color of your skin matches the hue of the majority or not is still a consideration employers have before hiring someone. Simply put, instead of people being denied employment because they are a minority or female, we've started denying people employment if they're a majority or male. How is one less racist than the other?
Affirmative action is hurting our economy, by accelerating unqualified people through the ranks based on their skin color. Michael Steele is a good example. This retard has wasted tons of RNC donor money, and caught in a few scandals, because he wasn't qualified for the job. The republicans felt they needed a response from a "black man" to keep from appearing racist while opposing Barack Obama. So, instead of looking at who they had based on qualifications, they made their decision based on race. Now they have an idiot who says he has a "slimmer margin" because he's black. The same garbage Obama throws out there when things get sticky: The Race Card.
How can making a decision to hire someone based on race not be considered racist? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills, doesn't anyone else see it?
Not only is affirmative action racist, it proliferates racism. EVERY single place I've ever worked has one thing in common. All of the white people think the black employees are there simply to make a quota, and have no real skill. It doesn't matter if the black man is the best worker there, the assumption is affirmative action put him there.
Sadly, the Republicans have decided to join the Democrats in this racist practice, and are even dumb enough to apologize for "racist tea-partiers" even when there is no evidence of such.
It's a sick, sad world, where we're still more worried about the color of skin, instead of the content of character.
Sorry King, you're dream will have to wait.
Whether the color of your skin matches the hue of the majority or not is still a consideration employers have before hiring someone. Simply put, instead of people being denied employment because they are a minority or female, we've started denying people employment if they're a majority or male. How is one less racist than the other?
Affirmative action is hurting our economy, by accelerating unqualified people through the ranks based on their skin color. Michael Steele is a good example. This retard has wasted tons of RNC donor money, and caught in a few scandals, because he wasn't qualified for the job. The republicans felt they needed a response from a "black man" to keep from appearing racist while opposing Barack Obama. So, instead of looking at who they had based on qualifications, they made their decision based on race. Now they have an idiot who says he has a "slimmer margin" because he's black. The same garbage Obama throws out there when things get sticky: The Race Card.
How can making a decision to hire someone based on race not be considered racist? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills, doesn't anyone else see it?
Not only is affirmative action racist, it proliferates racism. EVERY single place I've ever worked has one thing in common. All of the white people think the black employees are there simply to make a quota, and have no real skill. It doesn't matter if the black man is the best worker there, the assumption is affirmative action put him there.
Sadly, the Republicans have decided to join the Democrats in this racist practice, and are even dumb enough to apologize for "racist tea-partiers" even when there is no evidence of such.
It's a sick, sad world, where we're still more worried about the color of skin, instead of the content of character.
NPR outted as "Birthers"
Click image to enlarge
No one requested a correction, but then again, who listens to NPR?
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Nurse Who Exposed Infanticide-Based Abortions: Obama Lied During Debate
Nurse Who Exposed Infanticide-Based Abortions: Obama Lied During Debate
This is old, but I think most people missed it the first time around. Even if you're pro-abortion, how can you be pro-infanticide?
This is old, but I think most people missed it the first time around. Even if you're pro-abortion, how can you be pro-infanticide?
Issa aims to unmask health care deals - Chris Frates - POLITICO.com
Issa aims to unmask health care deals - Chris Frates - POLITICO.com
Let's have a look at the back-door shenanigans that made this terrible health care bill possible.
Let's have a look at the back-door shenanigans that made this terrible health care bill possible.
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Michael Steele: I'm not going anywhere - Andy Barr - POLITICO.com
Michael Steele: I'm not going anywhere - Andy Barr - POLITICO.com
Steele plays the race card, brings more shame to America.
We already have a president who plays the race card, we don't need that garbage from the leader of the GOP. Another example of how affirmative action puts unqualified people in high places.
Steele plays the race card, brings more shame to America.
We already have a president who plays the race card, we don't need that garbage from the leader of the GOP. Another example of how affirmative action puts unqualified people in high places.
Monday, April 5, 2010
Army threatens officer questioning eligibility
Army threatens officer questioning eligibility
Well, here we go again. Remember the Stefan Cook fiasco? Let's see if the government puts up some evidence this time, or cops out and cancels his orders. They'll see a string of challenges if they don't answer this question soon. There are already quite a few soldiers questioning their commander in chief publicly.
Well, here we go again. Remember the Stefan Cook fiasco? Let's see if the government puts up some evidence this time, or cops out and cancels his orders. They'll see a string of challenges if they don't answer this question soon. There are already quite a few soldiers questioning their commander in chief publicly.
Housing protest leads to takeover of duplex
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/04/04/BUTO1CPN1U.DTL
It's official, SFPD are a bunch of impotent security guards.
It's official, SFPD are a bunch of impotent security guards.
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Friday, April 2, 2010
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Why Obama is ineligible – regardless of his birthplace
Why Obama is ineligible – regardless of his birthplace
Take a good hard look and make your own decision.
Take a good hard look and make your own decision.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Obama: Tea party based on eligibility issue
Obama: Tea party based on eligibility issue
He's brave enough to talk about it, but not brave enough to stop it by releasing his records.
He's brave enough to talk about it, but not brave enough to stop it by releasing his records.
N.Y. Times columnist: Death panels will save 'a lot of money'
N.Y. Times columnist: Death panels will save 'a lot of money'
Remember, you were warned. I'm not a Palin fan, but she saw this one coming and did her best to warn us.
Remember, you were warned. I'm not a Palin fan, but she saw this one coming and did her best to warn us.
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Appropriations Chair Threatens to De-Fund Attorney General Over Health Care Suit
Appropriations Chair Threatens to De-Fund Attorney General Over Health Care Suit
This reminds me of when Obama "fired" the Inspector General for doing his job.
This reminds me of when Obama "fired" the Inspector General for doing his job.
Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775.
No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.
Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.
I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free-- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!
They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.
It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Dingell slip: "...to control the people."
The truth comes out, what Health Care Reform is really all about: CONTROL
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Definition of Socialism
The harder you work, the less you're rewarded. The less you work, the more you're rewarded.
What brought our country it's #1 superpower status, is the antithesis of the statement above. In capitalism, the best and brightest can rise to the top and become successful. That's why they all came to The United States and made us the powerhouse we used to be. Sadly, we seem to have peaked as a superpower. Socialism threatens to drag our society down in mediocrity. Who will strive to achieve, when the reward is so small?
What brought our country it's #1 superpower status, is the antithesis of the statement above. In capitalism, the best and brightest can rise to the top and become successful. That's why they all came to The United States and made us the powerhouse we used to be. Sadly, we seem to have peaked as a superpower. Socialism threatens to drag our society down in mediocrity. Who will strive to achieve, when the reward is so small?
Monday, March 22, 2010
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Does this look fishy to you?
Maybe I'm a cynic, maybe I'm paranoid, but what the hell is this garbage? I've never seen an EO with a blank date. Has this guy already signed it? How much weight does an EO carry over Congress? Is this an enforceable law, or some bull$#!+ to get pro-life Democrats to commit political suicide and vote to fund federally subsidized abortions?
Executive Order
- - - - - - -
ensuring enforcement and implementation of
abortion restrictions in the patient protection and affordable care act
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the
laws of the United States
of America, including the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act" (approved March __, 2010), I hereby order as follows:Section 1. Policy.
Following the recent passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("the Act"), it is necessary to establish an adequate enforcement mechanism to ensure that Federal funds are not used for abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered), consistent with a longstanding Federal statutory restriction that is commonly known as the Hyde Amendment. The purpose of this Executive Order is to establish a comprehensive, government-wide set of policies and procedures to achieve this goal and to make certain that all relevant actors-Federal officials, state officials (including insurance regulators) and health care providers-are aware of their responsibilities, new and old.
The Act maintains current Hyde Amendment restrictions governing abortion policy and extends those restrictions to the newly-created health insurance exchanges. Under the Act, longstanding Federal laws to protect conscience (such as the Church Amendment, 42 U.S.C. §300a-7, and the Weldon Amendment, Pub. L. No. 111-8, §508(d)(1) (2009)) remain intact and new protections prohibit discrimination against health care facilities and health care providers because of an unwillingness to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.
Numerous executive agencies have a role in ensuring that these restrictions are enforced, including the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).
Section 2. Strict Compliance with Prohibitions on Abortion Funding in Health Insurance Exchanges.
The Act specifically prohibits the use of tax credits and cost-sharing reduction payments to pay for abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered) in the health insurance exchanges that will be operational in 2014. The Act also imposes strict payment and accounting requirements to ensure that Federal funds are not used for abortion services in exchange plans (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered) and requires state health insurance commissioners to ensure that exchange plan funds are segregated by insurance companies in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, OMB funds management circulars, and accounting guidance provided by the Government Accountability Office.
I hereby direct the Director of OMB and the Secretary of HHS to develop, within 180 days of the date of this Executive Order, a model set of segregation guidelines for state health insurance commissioners to use when determining whether exchange plans are complying with the Act's segregation requirements, established in Section 1303 of the Act, for enrollees receiving Federal financial assistance. The guidelines shall also offer technical information that states should follow to conduct independent regular audits of insurance companies that participate in the health insurance exchanges. In developing these model guidelines, the Director of OMB and the Secretary of HHS shall consult with executive agencies and offices that have relevant expertise in accounting principles, including, but not limited to, the Department of the Treasury, and with the Government Accountability Office. Upon completion of those model guidelines, the Secretary of HHS should promptly initiate a rulemaking to issue regulations, which will have the force of law, to interpret the Act's segregation requirements, and shall provide guidance to state health insurance commissioners on how to comply with the model guidelines.
Section 3. Community Health Center Program.
The Act establishes a new Community Health Center (CHC) Fund within HHS, which provides additional Federal funds for the community health center program. Existing law prohibits these centers from using federal funds to provide abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered), as a result of both the Hyde Amendment and longstanding regulations containing the Hyde language. Under the Act, the Hyde language shall apply to the authorization and appropriations of funds for Community Health Centers under section 10503 and all other relevant provisions. I hereby direct the Secretary of HHS to ensure that program administrators and recipients of Federal funds are aware of and comply with the limitations on abortion services imposed on CHCs by existing law. Such actions should include, but are not limited to, updating Grant Policy Statements that accompany CHC grants and issuing new interpretive rules.
Section 4. General Provisions.
(a) Nothing in this Executive Order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) authority granted by law or presidential directive to an agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This Executive Order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This Executive Order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity against the United States, its departments, agencies, entities, officers, employees or agents, or any other person.
THE WHITE HOUSE
Media Lying About Racist Attacks on Black Reps By Tea Party Protesters…VIDEO PROOF
Media Lying About Racist Attacks on Black Reps By Tea Party Protesters…VIDEO PROOF
Gee, you say you got spit on? That's a shame, that's awful! Whoever spit on you should pay! Are you going to press charges? No? Gee, why not? Maybe because you made that $#!+ up?
Gee, you say you got spit on? That's a shame, that's awful! Whoever spit on you should pay! Are you going to press charges? No? Gee, why not? Maybe because you made that $#!+ up?
How to Fix Healthcare
First of all, most people fail to realize what's breaking our system right now. In the United States, anyone with or without insurance can go to a hospital emergency room and receive quality medical treatment. This includes illegal aliens. Sounds like everyone's getting health care to me! There are two major reasons health care costs are rising, and neither one of them is an "evil" insurance company.
The first is frivolous lawsuits. Insane amounts of money have been awarded for medical malpractice suits. The result is higher malpractice insurance premiums. Doctors didn't go to school for 10 years to be poor, they're going to pass the cost on to you, and who could blame them? TORT reform would stop this problem in it's tracks, and has done so in Texas. Of course, Democrats won't entertain this idea, because their lawyer buddies can't keep making a killing off of lawsuits.
Another alternative is to stop treating millions of illegal aliens for free. After all, we're paying higher prices so doctors and nurses don't go broke treating them for free! Once again, honest taxpayers pay the cost through increased health care pricing to cover the loss of treating illegal aliens for free. Now, I'm not heartless. If an illegal alien really needs treatment, we should oblige. Then, to be even nicer, we can give them a free ride home (deportation) to their homeland. That way, we can still treat these people if they really need it, but I don't think it's fair for taxpayers to subsidize in illegal aliens trip to the emergency room for a runny nose, and I'd bet we would see too many minor medical problems in a place they were never supposed to be: The EMERGENCY room.
Now, I'm sure some of you are thinking, surely these illegal aliens get handed a medical bill. You're right, they do. Who's going to make them pay it? It's not as if you can "ruin their credit" if they don't. It's kinda like ol' Barry Obama's idea to tax oil companies to punish them for their success. Ultimately, it will be a tax on oil consumers, because oil companies will just pass the cost of the tax on to us. They'll just consider it part of their overhead, and it won't affect their profit margin.
Of course, this is what happens when people who know absolutely nothing about running a business (government) start telling businesses how to run their business. These jack-holes have never made a payroll, never even been in charge of anything remotely profitable, but they know what's best.
Keep in mind that both TORT Reform and and enforcing immigration laws are a hell of a lot more constitutional than this garbage congress is trying to push through. With two thirds of the government willing to ignore and dismiss The Constitution, only the judicial will be able to save us from this government takeover of yet another sector of our economy.
Also, with 34 states already invoking the 10th amendment to opt-out of health care reform, a failure by the judicial branch to uphold The Constitution may even result in civil war. I could be wrong, perhaps Americans can tolerate totalitarian tyranny these days, but I recall from history class that we started this country to free ourselves from tyranny.
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Friday, March 19, 2010
Breaking: While An Anxious Nation Is Transfixed By The Healthcare Debate, The Obama Administration Restores ACORN Funding
Breaking: While An Anxious Nation Is Transfixed By The Healthcare Debate, The Obama Administration Restores ACORN Funding
Want to set up a brothel with under-aged illegal alien girls? ACORN can help, by teaching you to write off your "whores" as dependents on your taxes!
Want to set up a brothel with under-aged illegal alien girls? ACORN can help, by teaching you to write off your "whores" as dependents on your taxes!
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Prayer to St. Patrick, Patron of Ireland
Dear St. Patrick,
in your humility you called yourself a sinner,
but you became a most successful missionary
and prompted countless pagans
to follow the Saviour.
Many of their descendents in turn
spread the Good News in numerous foreign lands.
Through your powerful intercession with God,
obtain the missionaries we need
to continue the work you began.
Amen.
Birther, Birther, Birther!
I know everyone has an opinion on this, why not make sure your opinion is an informed one instead of an ignorant one.
http://www.justice.gov/usao/nj/press/files/ande1028_r.htm
http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-99-00570.pdf
http://birther.com/
http://www.justice.gov/usao/nj/press/files/ande1028_r.htm
http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-99-00570.pdf
http://birther.com/
Attorney General Eric Holder says Osama bin Laden will not be captured alive - NYPOST.com
Attorney General Eric Holder says Osama bin Laden will not be captured alive - NYPOST.com
I don't know why anyone would think Democrats are soft on terror....
I don't know why anyone would think Democrats are soft on terror....
Monday, March 15, 2010
Unconstitutional Procedure Being Used to Pass Unconstitutional ObamaCare
Unconstitutional Procedure Being Used to Pass Unconstitutional ObamaCare
Yet another violation of the binding contract between the government and the governed known as the United States Constitution.
Yet another violation of the binding contract between the government and the governed known as the United States Constitution.
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Saturday, March 13, 2010
What is the Center for Responsible Lending?
What is the Center for Responsible Lending?
And why do they pressure financial institutions to give out bad loans?
And why do they pressure financial institutions to give out bad loans?
Friday, March 12, 2010
"Under God" upheld in Pledge
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/03/11/BAS71CEC9F.DTL&tsp=1
I pledge allegiance, to the flag, of The United States of America, and to the republic, for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Some jackhole atheist tried to have the pledge removed from public schools citing seperation of church and state. This guy obviously has too much free time. He doesn't seem to understand that having a government that acknowledges God, and thus acknowledges our inalienable God-given rights, is a safeguard from tyranny. What Communist China has done to Tibet is a very good example of what happens when government dismisses, then tries to replace God.
I pledge allegiance, to the flag, of The United States of America, and to the republic, for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Some jackhole atheist tried to have the pledge removed from public schools citing seperation of church and state. This guy obviously has too much free time. He doesn't seem to understand that having a government that acknowledges God, and thus acknowledges our inalienable God-given rights, is a safeguard from tyranny. What Communist China has done to Tibet is a very good example of what happens when government dismisses, then tries to replace God.
Bill requires U.S. withdrawal from NAFTA
Bill requires U.S. withdrawal from NAFTA
Next time you dismiss a third party candidate, remember the words of Ross Perot about NAFTA: "You hear that sucking sound, that's the economy!"
Next time you dismiss a third party candidate, remember the words of Ross Perot about NAFTA: "You hear that sucking sound, that's the economy!"
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Monday, March 8, 2010
USA Today: Average Salaries for Gov't vs Private jobs
Of course, this doesn't factor in all of those cushy gov't perks and benefits.
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Friday, March 5, 2010
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Birther Legislation takes the movement out of the fringe
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27721631/Table-of-Bills-Pending-in-State-Legislatures-Regarding-Eligibility-for-the-Presidency
If Obama has nothing to hide, I suppose he'll have no concerns about his eligibility in 2012.
If Obama has nothing to hide, I suppose he'll have no concerns about his eligibility in 2012.
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Happy Birthday to The Republic of Texas! Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad!
The Unanimous Declaration of Independence made by the Delegates of the People of Texas in General Convention at the Town of Washington on the 2nd day of March 1836
When a government has ceased to protect the lives, liberty and property of the people, from whom its legitimate powers are derived, and for the advancement of whose happiness it was instituted, and so far from being a guarantee for the enjoyment of those inestimable and inalienable rights, becomes an instrument in the hands of evil rulers for their oppression.
When the Federal Republican Constitution of their country, which they have sworn to support, no longer has a substantial existence, and the whole nature of their government has been forcibly changed, without their consent, from a restricted federative republic, composed of sovereign states, to a consolidated central military despotism, in which every interest is disregarded but that of the army and the priesthood, both the eternal enemies of civil liberty, the everready minions of power, and the usual instruments of tyrants.
When, long after the spirit of the constitution has departed, moderation is at length so far lost by those in power, that even the semblance of freedom is removed, and the forms themselves of the constitution discontinued, and so far from their petitions and remonstrances being regarded, the agents who bear them are thrown into dungeons, and mercenary armies sent forth to force a new government upon them at the point of the bayonet.
When, in consequence of such acts of malfeasance and abdication on the part of the government, anarchy prevails, and civil society is dissolved into its original elements. In such a crisis, the first law of nature, the right of self-preservation, the inherent and inalienable rights of the people to appeal to first principles, and take their political affairs into their own hands in extreme cases, enjoins it as a right towards themselves, and a sacred obligation to their posterity, to abolish such government, and create another in its stead, calculated to rescue them from impending dangers, and to secure their future welfare and happiness.
Nations, as well as individuals, are amenable for their acts to the public opinion of mankind. A statement of a part of our grievances is therefore submitted to an impartial world, in justification of the hazardous but unavoidable step now taken, of severing our political connection with the Mexican people, and assuming an independent attitude among the nations of the earth.
The Mexican government, by its colonization laws, invited and induced the Anglo-American population of Texas to colonize its wilderness under the pledged faith of a written constitution, that they should continue to enjoy that constitutional liberty and republican government to which they had been habituated in the land of their birth, the United States of America.
In this expectation they have been cruelly disappointed, inasmuch as the Mexican nation has acquiesced in the late changes made in the government by General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna, who having overturned the constitution of his country, now offers us the cruel alternative, either to abandon our homes, acquired by so many privations, or submit to the most intolerable of all tyranny, the combined despotism of the sword and the priesthood.
It has sacrificed our welfare to the state of Coahuila, by which our interests have been continually depressed through a jealous and partial course of legislation, carried on at a far distant seat of government, by a hostile majority, in an unknown tongue, and this too, notwithstanding we have petitioned in the humblest terms for the establishment of a separate state government, and have, in accordance with the provisions of the national constitution, presented to the general Congress a republican constitution, which was, without just cause, contemptuously rejected.
It incarcerated in a dungeon, for a long time, one of our citizens, for no other cause but a zealous endeavor to procure the acceptance of our constitution, and the establishment of a state government.
It has failed and refused to secure, on a firm basis, the right of trial by jury, that palladium of civil liberty, and only safe guarantee for the life, liberty, and property of the citizen.
It has failed to establish any public system of education, although possessed of almost boundless resources, (the public domain,) and although it is an axiom in political science, that unless a people are educated and enlightened, it is idle to expect the continuance of civil liberty, or the capacity for self government.
It has suffered the military commandants, stationed among us, to exercise arbitrary acts of oppression and tyrrany, thus trampling upon the most sacred rights of the citizens, and rendering the military superior to the civil power.
It has dissolved, by force of arms, the state Congress of Coahuila and Texas, and obliged our representatives to fly for their lives from the seat of government, thus depriving us of the fundamental political right of representation.
It has demanded the surrender of a number of our citizens, and ordered military detachments to seize and carry them into the Interior for trial, in contempt of the civil authorities, and in defiance of the laws and the constitution.
It has made piratical attacks upon our commerce, by commissioning foreign desperadoes, and authorizing them to seize our vessels, and convey the property of our citizens to far distant ports for confiscation.
It denies us the right of worshipping the Almighty according to the dictates of our own conscience, by the support of a national religion, calculated to promote the temporal interest of its human functionaries, rather than the glory of the true and living God.
It has demanded us to deliver up our arms, which are essential to our defence, the rightful property of freemen, and formidable only to tyrannical governments.
It has invaded our country both by sea and by land, with intent to lay waste our territory, and drive us from our homes; and has now a large mercenary army advancing, to carry on against us a war of extermination.
It has, through its emissaries, incited the merciless savage, with the tomahawk and scalping knife, to massacre the inhabitants of our defenseless frontiers.
It hath been, during the whole time of our connection with it, the contemptible sport and victim of successive military revolutions, and hath continually exhibited every characteristic of a weak, corrupt, and tyrranical government.
These, and other grievances, were patiently borne by the people of Texas, untill they reached that point at which forbearance ceases to be a virtue. We then took up arms in defence of the national constitution. We appealed to our Mexican brethren for assistance. Our appeal has been made in vain. Though months have elapsed, no sympathetic response has yet been heard from the Interior.
We are, therefore, forced to the melancholy conclusion, that the Mexican people have acquiesced in the destruction of their liberty, and the substitution therfor of a military government; that they are unfit to be free, and incapable of self government.
The necessity of self-preservation, therefore, now decrees our eternal political separation.
We, therefore, the delegates with plenary powers of the people of Texas, in solemn convention assembled, appealing to a candid world for the necessities of our condition, do hereby resolve and declare, that our political connection with the Mexican nation has forever ended, and that the people of Texas do now constitute a free, Sovereign, and independent republic, and are fully invested with all the rights and attributes which properly belong to independent nations; and, conscious of the rectitude of our intentions, we fearlessly and confidently commit the issue to the decision of the Supreme arbiter of the destinies of nations.
[Signed, in the order shown on the handwritten document]
John S. D. Byrom
Francis Ruis
J. Antonio Navarro
Jesse B. Badgett
Wm D. Lacy
William Menifee
Jn. Fisher
Matthew Caldwell
William Motley
Lorenzo de Zavala
Stephen H. Everett
George W. Smyth
Elijah Stapp
Claiborne West
Wm. B. Scates
M. B. Menard
A. B. Hardin
J. W. Bunton
Thos. J. Gazley
R. M. Coleman
Sterling C. Robertson
Richard Ellis, President
of the Convention and Delegate
from Red River
James Collinsworth
Edwin Waller
Asa Brigham
Geo. C. Childress
Bailey Hardeman
Rob. Potter
Thomas Jefferson Rusk
Chas. S. Taylor
John S. Roberts
Robert Hamilton
Collin McKinney
Albert H. Latimer
James Power
Sam Houston
David Thomas
Edwd. Conrad
Martin Parmer
Edwin O. Legrand
Stephen W. Blount
Jms. Gaines
Wm. Clark, Jr.
Sydney O. Pennington
Wm. Carrol Crawford
Jno. Turner
Benj. Briggs Goodrich
G. W. Barnett
James G. Swisher
Jesse Grimes
S. Rhoads Fisher
John W. Moore
John W. Bower
Saml. A. Maverick (from Bejar)
Sam P. Carson
A. Briscoe
J. B. Woods
H. S. Kimble, Secretary
High court looks at reach of Second Amendment
High court looks at reach of Second Amendment
They should ask Ted Nugent to testify, he seems to get it.
They should ask Ted Nugent to testify, he seems to get it.
Monday, March 1, 2010
Dan Hannan calls for a return to sanity in the public finances and a revolutionary dispersal of power at the Brighton Tea Party
http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2010/02/dan-hannan-calls-for-a-return-to-sanity-in-the-public-finances-and-a-revolutionary-dispersal-of-powe.html
Looks like our cousins across the pond have awakened to the tyranny of socialism and globalism.
Looks like our cousins across the pond have awakened to the tyranny of socialism and globalism.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
